Planting the Seeds of Change

Guest Blogger: Joya Parsons is an organic market gardener working toward making a sustainable, local food system a reality. She runs Quite Contrary Garden and Homestead in Laurel, Delaware. She blogs at Quite Contrary Gardens and Twitters under @Kubileya

Seeds. They seem like such a small thing when compared to the big, complex problems the world is facing—climate change, poverty, war, famine, peak oil and an exploding population. They’re so small, in fact, that most will fit easily under your thumb.

But stop and think again. Without those tiny grains, what would be left on Earth?

Seeds are the bedrock of our food chain, the basic element of our sustenance. If they were to disappear tomorrow, we would follow them into oblivion with lightning speed. And, the most pressing issue people are often unaware of is that they are currently under grave and direct threats.

Sounds ominous, huh? Wondering why? Well, the answer is two-fold. First, we have witnessed a staggering loss of genetic diversity. In the past century, world agriculture has lost 75% of its genetic diversity to globalization, standardization and monoculture farming; 95% of the tomato varieties that existed in 1909 have become extinct; 91% of corn – gone. In addition, 95% of the cabbage varieties your great-great grandma grew have been consigned to oblivion. And though this may not seem on the surface to be a big deal, in reality it could mean the difference between full bellies and famine.

Genetic diversity in the food plants we grow is more than just the number of tomatoes listed in your favorite seed catalog. Diversity ensures that there are sufficient, genetically diverse and well-adapted varieties of any given plant to respond to any given situation. When a crisis arises, such as a new fungal disease or a severe drought, diverse genetics ensure that some varieties will naturally have genes that enable them to resist the threat and grow on, passing their genetic strengths on to the next generation. Without that diversity, with a significantly narrower gene pool to draw upon, crops and plants become susceptible to complete annihilation when these new threats arise. Such a disaster is not unprecedented.

The Irish Potato Famine of the 1840’s had such a devastating effect on Ireland’s population not only because they depended so heavily upon that one crop, but because they relied on only one variety. When the fungus hit, the one variety in wide cultivation was extremely susceptible and the mainstay of the Irish diet was destroyed within two seasons. Even as recently as the United States corn blight of the 1970’s, when 80% of American corn was of a similar genetic heritage and some 10 million acres of the crop were lost in a single season, we have seen the perils of lack of diversity.

The second threat to our seeds comes from industrial agriculture’s relative recent access to patents, as well as genetically modified organisms and seed company acquisitions, resulting in significant industry consolidation. Understanding this requires just a little micro-course in plant patent history (For a more complete history, check out the three-part series at Cooking Up A Story). In 1930, the Plant Patent Act was passed, which allowed plant breeders, a relatively new profession, to patent a single, specific plant that they had bred themselves. Patents were limited to only that specific plant and any asexual propagations of said plant. Seeds, as the result of sexual reproduction, were specifically barred from patent. Fast-forward to 1970 and the passage of the Plant Variety Protection Act. This legislation gave plant breeders the right to patent an entire variety of genetically similar plants, as well as their seeds and all subsequent generations. Fast-forward again, this time to 1980. The United States Supreme Court decision of Diamond v. Chakrabarty, a 5-4 split decision, gave individuals, and corporations acting as individuals, the right to a utility patent for laboratory engineered organisms, including seeds, under the 1952 Patent Act. Yes, that’s a bunch of gobblety-gook.

What it means is this: corporations have been given the power to own life. When you combine this with the consolidation of the global seed market by these same corporations, entities such as Monsanto and DuPont can not only own life, they can also control access and set the going price of those living things. In buying up every major seed supplier, they are systematically eliminating competing varieties and crowning their own patented seeds as the only choice in the marketplace.

Unfortunately, that’s not all. The right and ability to patent life extends to the genetic level, thanks to Diamond v. Chakrabarty. A corporation, like Monsanto for instance, can own a single gene and by extension, own any form of life containing said gene. This is a problem in the plant world because, let’s face it, plants are promiscuous. They pollinate far and wide with any willing partner. So, genetically modified corn containing Monsanto’s patented genetic sequence can cross-contaminate a nearby field of non-GM, non-corporate owned corn, and simply by the act of drifting pollen, transform every seed produced by that corn into Monsanto’s property.

So, this is a screwed up situation. But what can we do about it? We’re just the little people, with no real say in what happens on the giant, global corporate stage, right? Well, not really. We can take our seeds back. We can keep them out of the hands of Monsanto and DuPont. We can breed back our lost diversity in our own backyards, with our own hands, to serve our own communities and interests. Here’s how…

First, we must learn how to avoid plants and seeds that are already under patent, which can be difficult! If you are lucky, there will be a number next to the plant listing in the seed catalog, or a quick Google of the variety name will turn up a number. If the letters PVP are in front, you can search the Plant Variety Protection database. Now, this doesn’t always work, since many PVP registrations refer to a variety number, rather than a name and you may have to scroll through the entire “tomato” section (or whatever section is relevant) to double check that your variety is not listed or, if it is, that the patent has not yet expired. Another tactic is to check through the USDA Plant Inventory files, which list all varieties to come on the market in a given year going back to 1998. As a very general rule, all seeds listed as F1 hybrids are probably patented (or at least they were at one time) and any seeds introduced more than twenty-five years age can no longer be under patent.

These information sources are great, but they are not 100% reliable or complete. In order to really make sure that your money isn’t going into Monsanto’s pockets, heirlooms and open-pollinated plants that came into existence before 1970 are almost a sure bet. These seeds have been perfected over decades, centuries in some cases. They’ve survived through the years because farmers and gardeners have recognized their merits, superior taste and performance. They were, by and large, created on the front lines, in backyards and farmlands far, far from the clutches of any corporate entity.

But planting patent- and corporate-free seeds is only the first step. The next step is where we really begin to take back our seeds. We have to save them from season to season. We have to relearn what our grandparents knew and cut the corporate stranglehold by providing seeds to ourselves and our communities– tomatoes, peppers, kale, radishes, lettuce and more. When we begin to do this, magic will happen.

Seeds and plants are not static copies of their ancestors. Even the oldest heirlooms are dynamic, living beings constantly adapting and evolving. If we understand, even on just a very basic level, how to choose the best plants to save seed from—the ones with the best tasting fruit, the ones that get through the season with the least pest damage, the ones that grow the fastest or yield the most, then the seeds we save will grow into better and better plants every year. They will adapt to whatever region of the world we live in. After a couple generations and a few genetic mutations and cross-pollinations, our seeds will begin to transform. Even if I start with a Green Zebra tomato (developed by private citizen and plant breeder Tom Wagner) and another gardener across the country starts with the same tomato, within a matter of a few years saving seeds, we will have created two different, genetically divergent lines. Within a decade or so, the two lines may not even bear much resemblance to one another anymore, both having changed and adapted to local conditions. I’ve seen this phenomenon first-hand among my local gardening group. The seeds we select and save from season to season become the superstars of our gardens, performing better and better every year. This is how the great diversity in heirloom vegetables came into being in the first place and we can repeat it to create new ‘heirlooms’ that we can pass on to others. If we the people can do this, we will begin to rebuild the lost diversity in our agricultural heritage.

It will be a slow process. It will take decades, possibly more than one lifetime, to regain even a fraction of what we have lost. However, with the looming threats of climate change, new diseases, and corporate gate-keepers intent on restricting access to the most basic elements of human life, this project, this truly grassroots mission could not be more important. It’s time to take back what belongs to all of us. It’s time to take responsibility for preserving and rebuilding the agricultural wealth that genetic diversity assures, corporations be damned.

Who knows? When the next devastating plant disease comes rolling through the countryside, the variety that saves the entire crop for the future of humanity may be the very one we grew and saved in our own backyards.

Some seed sources dedicated to diversity and non-patented seeds to get you started:

Baker Creek Heirloom Seeds

Seed Savers Exchange

J.L. Hudson, Seedsman

Freedom Seeds

Organic Heirlooms

Native Seeds of the Southwest

Amish Land Seeds

Heirloom Seeds

Victory Seeds

18 responses to “Planting the Seeds of Change

  1. Joya,

    Thank you for this wonderful and approachable post on such an important and potentially overwhelming topic. If only everyone knew in the first place, perhaps this would never have happened! Absent that, at least we may begin to repair the damage and avert the potential food disaster that is looming as a consequence of what you outline above. This begins with knowing there is an issue, as this has been a silent development of which most eaters remain unaware. Hopefully, the more we can educate ourselves and each other on these issues, the harder it will be to erode an already compromised food system that favors corporate interests (consolidation) over the genetic interests (diversity) of life itself.]

    I would like to add the good folks at Siskiyou Sustainable Cooperative (http://www.siskiyoucoop.com) of Southern Oregon to your list of resources above. For an idea of their perspective, I also refer readers to an article by seedsman Don Tipping titled “Heirlooms of Tomorrow” http://biodynamicseeds.blogspot.com/2009/06/heirlooms-of-tomorrow.html (also published in the most recent Permaculture Activist Magazine.)

    Mother Nature encourages diversity, and doesn’t try to consolodate and eliminate competition. While our economic systems and laws endeavor to come into balance with the greater ecosystem in which they are embedded and dependent, it is up to the Rogue Agents of Change to preserve the genetic heritage of our children. Thank you to all who are growing out the future.

    Together on Earth,

    Chris Byrne

    [Further reference: My education about the GMO / patenting life / unintended transference of “ownership” of seed thanks to open pollination began years ago with a screening of the movie The Future of Food and the book Seeds of Deception. I encourage readers that wish to go further into the issue to seek out these resources (and be prepared to be appalled.)

  2. Chris,
    Thank you for your comment and your wonderful insight. Thye say those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it. I hope that the more we get the message out there and the more people we can educate, the more people will want to take action and responsibility for their future.

    Thank you for the link to Siskiyou Co-op. If anyone else has a favorite resource, I encourage you to post! I know there are seed savers, gardeners and farmers around the world working toward the goal of preserving and rebuilding diversity and we need to know about them!

    The Future of Food is “must-view” information. It’s available to watch online through hulu.com: http://www.hulu.com/watch/67878/the-future-of-food

  3. Hi Joya,

    Renewing America’s Food Traditions, an alliance managed by Slow Food USA, publishes about preserving heirloom and traditional food varieties. See: http://bit.ly/3jjzpE

    A few years ago i worked with Gary Nabhan on the book about the West Coast region, Salmon Nation. See: http://bit.ly/sQgfg

  4. Howard,
    Thank you very much for commenting and for sharing the link to Slow Food’s resources on preserving our diverse heritage. It’s an honor to have one as knowledgeable in this area as yourself read and comment.

    As an aspiring Slow Foodie, myself, I am deeply grateful for the work Slow Food USA accomplishes. Many of the foodways and skills that I am striving to relearn and preserve are directly attributable to their vision and education.

    I wonder if you could tell us briefly what you feel is the most important aspect of preserving and rebuilding our local foodways, which are deeply tied in to the enormous diversity our food once had? I know for me, it’s easy to feel pulled in a hundred different directions, like I must learn averything and do everything all at once.

  5. Hi again Joya,

    Thanks for your kind words. My contribution to the RAFT project was all about editing and publishing. The food knowledge came from others!

    In any event, i’m not sure if this gets at your question, but here are a couple of things on my mind.

    One way to think of diversity is as a factor that supports social-ecological resilience. Other factors are modularity and feedback. I wrote about these ideas in an essay called Small Pieces Loosely Joined (http://bit.ly/17sNEP), in which i tried to make a first-principles case for local economies.

    Also: We lack data on how much food is locally produced and consumed. To me, this is important. (Measure what matters.) USDA is taking comments (until tomorrow) on its census data collection. Two links in this tweet of mine. http://bit.ly/ptUHx

    Best,

    • Thank you again, Howard, for taking the time to respond. Your essay is fantastic and I’ve filled in the USDA census comments form and re-Tweeted it.

  6. I think your piece is very empowering if people realize they have the power to restore something so valuable (our seed diversity) in such simple ways… save the best seeds and grow the food they produce, even if the only growing space is in a pot on an apartment windowsill. It’s an important labor of love and faith in the future, that we can all participate in. We can make a difference.

    • Power to the people! It really is all about educating people to let them know that they can truly make a difference. We live in a generation where we’re so accustomed to having corporations do everything for us. I think most people don’t even realize how much control and power that gives away or how much they can take back by relying on themselves and their communities.

  7. Their whole war on life comes crashing down when the first judge hears the first suit that clearly identifies gene migration as a threat as surely as are wild dogs left to run wild in your neighborhood. Why is it so difficult to present that case?

    Perhaps by reporting the issues that surround that conundrum we could cause some bright lawyer to be the first able to pull the plug on this whole travesty.

    • Hi John,
      I think it has been so difficult because most judges (and lawyers and people) are not well-versed in the particulars of plant propagation. I hope the justice system gets a chance to undo this insanity before too long.

  8. Terrific piece, Joya. Thank you for writing it. I especially appreciate you walking us through the ownership of genetic traits and placing it in the larger, “botanical-historical” context. I also dig your take on seed-saving as an engine for local foods. Fascinating.

    For what it’s worth, here’s a terrific graphic showing the absurd centralization of the seed industry. Warning. It’s mind-numbing:

    https://www.msu.edu/~howardp/seedindustry.html

    It was created by the same dude, Dr. Phil Howard, who brought you the organic industry flowchart:

    And here’s an interview with Dr. Phil Howard himself, conducted by Mexican wrestlers on Fair Food Fight:

    http://fairfoodfight.com/blog/truemosquito/liveblogging-provender-ii-man-behind-charts

    • Gracias, Dragon (my keyboard doesn’t make the fancy accents)

      Thank you for the seed industry information! The industry graphic is more than mind-numbing. It’s frightening and completely baffling as to how we’ve allowed this to happen while we were mostly blissfully unaware.

      But we can draw a line in the sand and say that it can go no further- inspire people to action instead of just outrage. I’m excited about a future where we can take back what is ours, take back control and responsibility.

  9. Pingback: Quick Green Reads For The Weekend Volume 132. | The Good Human

  10. This article alone, should make it important to all of us to save seeds and do business with private seed savers.

    http://gmfoodwatch.tribe.net/thread/78999f60-b0a6-4f52-957d-74d0bf240d96

  11. The magazine, Permaculture Activist that published the article by Don Tipping referenced above can be found at http://permacultureactivist.net/

  12. However, to my knowledge (as I went there first looking for it) The Permaculture Activist articles are not available online, hence linking to the original blog posting of the article.

  13. While the Activist does not print all its articles online it does offer a good number of representative examples. I just added a link to this article on our site at http://permacultureactivist.net/articles/articles.htm

  14. Pingback: seed and vine « Thought Shop

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s